×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

DEVELOPING THE EDU-OPT MODEL FOR STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT IN EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTION

By
Sardorbek Isroilov Orcid logo ,
Sardorbek Isroilov

Turan International University Uzbekistan

Kodirov Zokhid Zokirkhanovich Orcid logo ,
Kodirov Zokhid Zokirkhanovich

Turan International University Uzbekistan

Akbarov Chingiz Adkhamjanovich Orcid logo ,
Akbarov Chingiz Adkhamjanovich

Turan International University Uzbekistan

Sobirjonov Khumoyun Boburjon Ugli Orcid logo ,
Sobirjonov Khumoyun Boburjon Ugli

Turan International University Uzbekistan

Khusainov Ilyos Jamoliddin ugli Orcid logo
Khusainov Ilyos Jamoliddin ugli

Turan International University Uzbekistan

Abstract

The paper introduces a strategic management model called the EDU-OPT Model, which will help to improve the resilience of the operations of educational organizations and their financial sustainability, especially in a developing economy like Uzbekistan. The model utilizes the concepts of the Dynamic Stochastic General Equilibrium (DSGE) modeling which has been widely used in the monetary policymaking of national economies to reconcile macroeconomic theory with institutional strategic planning. Conceptualizing the educational institution as an evolving ecosystem, EDU-OPT model takes as its variables the digital financial development, financial frictions, technological advancements to model the dynamics of interaction between tuition pricing and state subsidies on the enrollment stability and stability of the institution in the long term. The results of the simulation, supported by ANOVA, indicate that the EDU-OPT model can be trusted as being much more effective than the conventional traditional methods of management that are not dynamic in nature. Particularly, the reduction of the enrollment volatility in the EDU-OPT model is 22 % lower than in traditional models and 30 % more reactionary to economic shocks by a proactive Institutional Taylor Rule that alters the internal financial aid due to the cost inflation. According to 2018-2025 data, technological advancement, although being the main driver of growth, may have a positive effect on any economy under certain conditions, that is, financial liquidity may negate the effect, and this liquidity constraint can be addressed only with dynamic optimization. These results imply that the institution of higher education in Uzbekistan will have to shift its leadership towards more data-centered and general equilibrium leadership that is able to predict both macroeconomic disruptions and the digital transformation.

References

1.
Jiang S, Qiu S, Zhou H. Will digital financial development affect the effectiveness of monetary policy in emerging market countries? Economic Research-Ekonomska Istraživanja. 2021;35(1):3437–72.
2.
Luo S, Zhou G, Zhou J. The Impact of Electronic Money on Monetary Policy: Based on DSGE Model Simulations. Mathematics. 2021;9(20):2614.
3.
Apanisile O. Remittances, financial development and the effectiveness of monetary policy transmission mechanism in Nigeria: A DSGE approach. Indian Economic Review. 1986;(1):91–112.
4.
Ramadugu R. Analyzing the Role of CBDC and Cryptocurrency in Emerging Market Economies: A New Keynesian DSGE Approach. 2025 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT). IEEE; 2025. p. 1300–6.
5.
Oye Q, Alege P. Fiscal and monetary policy interactions in a developing economy: A DSGE-based evidence from Nigeria. CBN Journal of Applied Statistics. 2022;(2):117–54.
6.
Fonseca-Zendejas A, Borrego-Salcido C, Venegas-Martínez F. An estimated DSGE model under the new keynesian framework for Mexico. Computational Economics. 2025;(2):1297–320.
7.
Stawska J, Mourao PR. Policy mix under stress: review of economic reactions to fiscal and monetary policies using DSGE. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues. 2025;12(4):477–96.
8.
Khan MA, Khan Z, Saleem SF. Monetary policy effectiveness in Asian developing economies: the moderating role of financial sector development. Journal of Financial Economic Policy. 2023;15(3):226–47.
9.
Nguyen TD, Trieu LK, Le AH. The monetary policy of the State Bank of Vietnam, households and income distribution: the evidence from DSGE model. Journal of Financial Economic Policy. 2024;16(4):463–82.
10.
MOHABATPOOR R, GOOGERDCHIAN A, AZARBAYJANI K, NAZARI A. ANALYZING INTERNATIONAL CAPITAL FLOWS TO DEVELOPING AND EMERGING MARKET COUNTRIES USING A TWO-COUNTRY DYNAMIC STOCHASTIC GENERAL EQUILIBRIUM (DSGE) MODEL UNDER ASYMMETRIC INFORMATION STRUCTURE. Global Economy Journal. 2022;22(03).
11.
Syarifuddin F, Bakhtiar T. The Macroeconomic Effects of an Interest-Bearing CBDC: A DSGE Model. Mathematics. 2022;10(10):1671.
12.
Iqbal T, Majeed S. Macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy in the presence of the informal sector: a DSGE analysis. Journal of Economic Studies. 2025;1–24.
13.
Xie Y, Li Y. Technological progress, fiscal policy, and economic fluctuations in China: Evidence from the heterogeneous firm DSGE model during the COVID-19 pandemic. Economic Analysis and Policy. 2024;84:646–62.
14.
Ben Salem S, Sayari S, Labidi M. Effect of Financial Frictions on Monetary Policy Conduct: A Comparative Analysis of DSGE Models with and without Financial Frictions. Economies. 2024;12(3):72.
15.
Semmler W, Toure M. Financial fragility, regime change, and monetary policy in an open economy – A model and empirical application to emerging market countries. International Economics. 2024;179:100532.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.