Careful control of the structural makeup of urban places is necessary to maintain their distinctive character while advancing sustainability. A successful approach to this problem is striking a balance between homogeneity and variability in order to provide an urban landscape that is both coherent and dynamic. In the past, homogeneity—which is defined by uniformity and is frequently connected to well-organized and visually appealing spaces—has been valued in urban planning. However, an excessive amount of homogeneity in urban areas and architectural styles could undermine a city's cohesiveness while restricting artistic freedom. Nonetheless, it has been shown that preserving a fundamental diversity of forms and functions can strengthen a city's resilience to changes. Fabric ratios of voids and volumes have been assessed using Cellular Automata investigations at different magnifications in places including Barcelona, Rome, and Hillah, revealing patterns of both independence and synchronization. These data-driven analyses make it easier to develop customized updates that target markets that lack distinctiveness. Others, meantime, flourish on fostered multiplicity, where creativity and social connections liberally support one another. Desired levels of homogeneity can be achieved through various interventions, such as zoning laws that support compact urban forms, green space efforts, and strategic development projects. By incorporating sustainability principles into urban design, these measures seek to create balanced environments that meet the needs of local residents while preserving the authentic character of urban areas.
References
1.
Salingaros NA. Complexity and Urban Coherence. Journal of Urban Design. 2000;5(3):291–316.
2.
Yang CT, Chen ST, Lien WH, Verma VK. Implementation of a Software-Defined Storage Service with Heterogeneous Storage Technologies. J Internet Serv Inf Secur. 2019;9(3):74–97.
3.
Couclelis H. From cellular automata to urban models: new principles for model development and implementation. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1997;24(2):165–74.
4.
Cassavia N, Caviglione L, Guarascio M, Manco G, Zuppelli M. Detection of steganographic threats targeting digital images in heterogeneous ecosystems through machine learning. Journal of Wireless Mobile Networks, Ubiquitous Computing, and Dependable Applications. 2022;13(3):50–67.
5.
Batty M, Couclelis H, Eichen M. Urban Systems as Cellular Automata. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design. 1997;24(2):159–64.
6.
Cao Y, Jiang L. Machine Learning based Suggestion Method for Land Suitability Assessment and Production Sustainability. Natural and Engineering Sciences. 2024;9(2):55–72.
7.
Adamatzky A. Game of Life Cellular Automata. Springer London; 2010.
8.
Sachdeva L, Upadhyay N. Digital Transformation and Sustainability: A Study of how Firms Use Digital to Achieve Sustainable Goals. Indian Journal of Information Sources and Services. 2024;14(4):42–7.
9.
Colaninno N, Roca J, Pfeffer K. An automatic classification of urban texture: form and compactness of morphological homogeneous structures in Barcelona.
10.
Hosseini M, Izni SI, Aidin NS, Hamed R. SIGNIFICANT FACTORS OF IMPLEMENTING OPEN BUILDING SYSTEMS IN MALAYSIA. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2022;1(26):49–60.
11.
Blecic I, Cecchini A, Prastacos P, Trunfio G, Verigos E. Modelling urban dynamics with cellular automata: A model of the city of Heraclion. In7th AGILE conference on geographic information science Heraklion: University of Crete Press. 2004;313–23.
12.
Kumar R, Rao P. Intelligent 3d Printing for Sustainable Construction. Association Journal of Interdisciplinary Technics in Engineering Mechanics. 2024;(3):22–9.
13.
Chahardowli M, Sajadzadeh H. A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City. Land Use Policy. 2022;114:105993.
14.
Lahon S, Chimpi K. Fostering Sustainable Technological Development in SMES from Developing Nations Within the Framework of the Digital Economy and Resource-Constrained Environments. Global Perspectives in Management. 2024;(4):15–25.
15.
Omole F, Olajiga OK, Olatunde TM. Sustainable urban design: A review of eco-friendly building practices and community impact. Engineering Science & Technology Journal. 2024;5(3):1020–30.
16.
Al-Mamany DA, Hameed AH, Muhauwiss FM. Prediction of Urban Growth Using Remote Sensing and the SLEUTH Model in Erbil City. Iraq International Journal of Advances in Engineering and Emerging Technology. 2022;13(2):147–66.
17.
Rojas Quezada C, Jorquera F. Urban Fabrics to Eco-Friendly Blue–Green for Urban Wetland Development. Sustainability. 2021;13(24):13745.
18.
Danesh M, Emadi M. Cell phones social networking software applications: Factors and features. International Academic Journal of Innovative Research. 2014;1(2):1–5.
19.
Chahardowli M, Sajadzadeh H. A strategic development model for regeneration of urban historical cores: A case study of the historical fabric of Hamedan City. Land Use Policy. 2022;114:105993.
20.
Larijani AH. Sustainable urban development, concepts, features, and indicators. International Academic Journal of Science and Engineering. 2016;3(6):9–14.
21.
Zheng B, Masrabaye F, Guiradoumngué GM, Zheng J, Liu L. Progress in Research on Sustainable Urban Renewal Since 2000: Library and Visual Analyses. Sustainability. 2021;13(8):4154.
22.
Greene M, Mora RI, Figueroa C, Waintrub N, Ortúzar JD. Towards a sustainable city: Applying urban renewal incentives according to the social and urban characteristics of the area. Habitat International. 2017;68:15–23.
23.
Alexander C. The Nature of Order. Books 1-4. Berkeley (CA): Center for Environmental Structure. 2001;
24.
Batty M. Urban Evolution on the Desktop: Simulation with the Use of Extended Cellular Automata. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space. 1998;30(11):1943–67.
25.
Maïzia M. A GIS for the homogeneity assessment of urban fabrics. InThe GIS as Design and Management Support. . Histocity Network. 1999;1–7.
26.
Margenstern M. Cellular automata in hyperbolic spaces. InAdvances in Unconventional Computing: . Cham: Springer International Publishing. 2016;1(343–389).
27.
Hijazi I, Li X, Koenig R, Schmit G, El Meouche R, Lv Z, et al. Measuring the homogeneity of urban fabric using 2D geometry data. Environment and Planning B: Urban Analytics and City Science. 2017;44(6):1097–121.
28.
Karduri R, Ananth C. Sustainable urban energy: integrating smart grids into smart cities. This paper has been published in. International Journal of Advanced Research in Basic Engineering Sciences and Technology(IJARBEST). 2023;(10).
29.
Mobaraki A, Oktay Vehbi B. A Conceptual Model for Assessing the Relationship between Urban Morphology and Sustainable Urban Form. Sustainability. 2022;14(5):2884.
30.
Pan W, Du J. Towards sustainable urban transition: A critical review of strategies and policies of urban village renewal in Shenzhen, China. Land Use Policy. 2021;111:105744.
31.
Sarvari H, Mehrabi A, Chan DW, Cristofaro M. Evaluating urban housing development patterns in developing countries: Case study of Worn-out Urban Fabrics in Iran. Sustainable Cities and Society. 2021;70:102941.
32.
Zheng W, Shen GQ, Wang H, Hong J, Li Z. Decision support for sustainable urban renewal: A multi-scale model. Land Use Policy. 2017;69:361–71.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
,
