×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

INTERSECTION OF PHILOLOGY AND SOCIOLOGY IN ANALYZING THE LINGUISTIC LANDSCAPE OF POSTCOLONIAL NATIONS

By
Sirojiddin Nurmatov Orcid logo ,
Sirojiddin Nurmatov

Tashkent State University of Oriental Studies , Tashkent , Uzbekistan

Dildora Mamaraimova Orcid logo ,
Dildora Mamaraimova

Termez State University , Termez , Uzbekistan

Nargiza Akhmedova Orcid logo ,
Nargiza Akhmedova

Oriental University Uzbekistan

Gullolahon Mehmonaliyeva Orcid logo ,
Gullolahon Mehmonaliyeva

Jizzakh branch of the National University of Uzbekistan named after Mirzo Ulugbek , Jizzakh , Uzbekistan

Mehrinoza Alieva Orcid logo ,
Mehrinoza Alieva

Andijan State University , Andijan , Uzbekistan

Feruza Shukurova Orcid logo ,
Feruza Shukurova

Jizzakh State Pedagogical University , Jizzakh , Uzbekistan

Sarvinoz Qodirova Orcid logo ,
Sarvinoz Qodirova

Termez University of Economics and Service Uzbekistan

Nilufar Abdullayeva Orcid logo
Nilufar Abdullayeva

Termez State University , Termez , Uzbekistan

Abstract

The paper delves into the query of how philology and sociology intersect when it comes to studying the linguistic terrain of postcolonial countries. The paper will explore the functionality of language in the public spaces as a symbol of power, identity, and resistance in postcolonial settings, with a specific emphasis on the linguistic signs in the development of social and cultural spaces. The study involves collateral research on inscriptions, signs, and other textual features in the urban and rural context of the postcolonial countries through a mixed method of philological findings and sociological frameworks. The linguistic patterns and semiotic features of these texts are explained through the philological analysis, whereas the social meanings, identity constructions, and power relations that lie in the linguistic landscape are explained through the sociological analysis. One of the most important conclusions made is that language in the public space tends to be indicative of the conflict between colonial past and postcolonial identity, and linguistic signs can be both modes of marginalization and opposition. The paper provides a conclusion to support the importance of an interdisciplinary approach to linguistic landscape studies in order to gain a clearer insight into the socio-political implications of language in postcolonial societies. The implications of the findings on linguistic and sociological studies are that the language may manifest itself as a challenge to the existing power frameworks and form part of the identity formation in postcolonial contexts.

References

1.
Bhujel B, Sinha S. Linguistic landscape as a tool of identity negotiation: The case of the Nepali ethnic communities in West Bengal. Ethnicities. 2025 Feb;25(1):43-68.
2.
Csapó-Horváth A, Makkos A. A Study of the Linguistic Landscape of a Hungarian University That Is Going International. Education Sciences. 2025 Nov 2;15(11):1466.
3.
Guarín D, Arias-Cortés D. English as Symbolic Capital: Globalization and the Linguistic Landscape of Armenia, Quindío (Colombia). Languages. 2025 Feb 21;10(3):34.
4.
Jiao Y, Singh MK. Linguistic landscape in George Town, Malaysia: Language visibility in a postcolonial and globalized context. Ampersand. 2024 Dec 1;13:100202.
5.
Kaibuldayeva A, Madiyeva G. Transformation of the urban linguistic landscape under the influence of social and cultural changes. European Journal of Language Policy. 2025 Oct 27;17(2):283-306. 2025;

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.