Each local, self-government unit which is planning to develop and later implement the project of land consolidation is confronted with the problem of choosing the cadastral municipality for land management via land consolidation. The appliance of multi-criteria decision method enables and helps the decision makers to act regularly and correctly when making a decision. Multi-criteria analysis, above all, enables decision making in conflict conditions. These conditions include multiple alternatives and criteria, from which some should be maximized, and others minimized. This paper deals with the problematic of the ranking of cadastral municipalities in which land management should be performed with the use of land consolidation, by applying COPRAS method. The paper also presents the evaluation of the defined model in the Municipality of Pećinci.
Available documentation of Banovići municipality. 2008.
2.
zemljištu Z. Sl. glasnik RS".
3.
Huang QH, Li MC, Chen ZJ, Li FX. Land consolidation: an approach for sustainable development in rural China. AMBIO. 2011;39(1):93 95.
4.
Long HL. Land consolidation: an indispensable way of spatial restructuring in rural China. Journal of Geographical Sciences. 2014;24(2):211 225.
5.
Long HL, Li Y, Liu Y, Woods M, Zou J. Accelerated restructuring in rural China fueled by ‘increasing vs. decreasing balance’: land-use policy for dealing with hollowed villages. Land Use Policy. 2012;29(1):11 22.
6.
Reerink G, Gelder JL. Land titling, perceived tenure security, and housing consolidation in the kampongs of Bandung, Indonesia. Habitat International. 2010;34(1):78 85.
7.
Sorensen A. Conflict, consensus or consent: implications of Japanese land readjustment practice for developing countries. Habitat International. 2000;24(1):51 73.
8.
Dijk T. Effects of land consolidation in practice analysis of post-war experience in the Netherlands. In: Proceedings of 22nd urban and regional data management symposiumdSeminar on land markets and land consolidation in Central Europe. 2000.
9.
Xia F, Yan J, Liu J. Research on governance path of rural settlements reconstruction patterns. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE. 2014;30(3):215 222.
10.
Trifkovic M, Marinkovic G, Ilić B, Pejičić G, Lazić J. Land consolidation and irrigation, case study Municipality of Velika Plana. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2016;14(1):35–45.
11.
G. M, T N. Trifković M.: Rangiranje komasacionih projekata primenom SAW metode. Geodetska služba, br. 2015;119(711):20-28,.
12.
G. M, M. T, J L. Rangiranje komasacionih projekata primenom TOPSIS metode, Zbornik radova Građevinskog fakulteta. 2015. p. 193-204,.
13.
G. M, T. N, M. T, Ž. N, G P. On the land consolidation projects and cadastral municipalities ranking, Tehnički vjesnik. Technical Gazette. 2016;23(4):1147-1153,.
14.
Stevović I. Strategic orientation to solar energy productionand long term financial. Archives for Technical Sciences. 2017;17(1):1-12,.
15.
B. K, G M. Trifković M.: Rangiranje katastarskih opština u Opštini Pećinci, Zbornik radova FTN. 2015.
16.
M. T, T N. Marinković G.: „Komasacija“. 2013.
17.
Dong Y, Zhang G, Hong WC, Xu Y. Consensus models for AHP group decision making under row geometric mean prioritization method. Decision Support Systems. 2010;49(281):289,.
18.
Stojanov A, D U. : Višekriterijumska analiza izbora uglja primenom SAW i COPRAS metode.
Citation
Copyright
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
