×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

DEEP LEARNING-GUIDED GENOMIC PROFILING FOR BRAIN TUMOR SUBTYPING USING HYBRID FEATURE SELECTION AND ENSEMBLE CLASSIFICATION

By
M. Yuvaraja Orcid logo ,
M. Yuvaraja

P. A. College of Engineering and Technology , Pollachi , India

S. Sureshkumar Orcid logo ,
S. Sureshkumar

P. A. College of Engineering and Technology , Pollachi , India

J. Dhanasekar Orcid logo ,
J. Dhanasekar

Sri Eshwar College of Engineering , Coimbatore , India

Vilas Namdeo Nitnaware Orcid logo ,
Vilas Namdeo Nitnaware

MAEER’S MIT , Mumbai , India

M. Sowmya Orcid logo ,
M. Sowmya

SRM Institute of Science and Technology (FSH) , Chennai , India

D. Kumar Orcid logo
D. Kumar

P.A. College of Engineering and Technology , Pollachi , India

Abstract

The problem of brain tumors is a range of different subtypes, which have a variety of clinical forms, and the diagnosis and treatment of tumors is a challenging task. This paper introduces a hybrid deep learning system that combines genomic profiling with MRI image analysis to provide an effective brain tumor subtyping. The framework is initiated by the preprocessing of MRI images, which is followed by grayscale conversion and noise reduction as done by Fast Non-Local Means (FNLM) filtering. This will aid in ensuring that important structural data is retained with minimal irrelevant noise. To conduct segmentation, the UNet++ framework is used, which is the best-performing architecture in medical image analysis. UNet++ enhances the conventional UNet by adding embedded skip routes, which allows a more productive information exchange between encoder and decoder networks, improving the accuracy of segmentation. The extraction of features is conducted by a local binary pattern (LBP), Gray-Level Co-occurrence Matrix (GLCM), and Discrete Wavelet Transform (DWT). These methods are able to reproduce both the frequency domain and textural characteristics of the tumor areas. The variables are further narrowed down to the most relevant ones by the Minimum Redundancy Maximum Relevance (mRMR) algorithm, thus only the most relevant features are taken in the classifier. The classification is done by an improved variant of the AlexNet that is optimized with the addition of batch normalization, global average pooling, and local response normalization parameters to minimize overfitting and maximize learning effectiveness. The model postulated in this study has a high performance of 99.79 %accuracy, 96.82 %sensitivity, 98.32 %specificity, and 98.61 %precision. These findings indicate the effectiveness of the hybrid approach, combining handcrafted characteristics and deep learning in early and confident brain tumor subtyping, which has considerable potential to enhance the level of diagnostic accuracy and individual treatment approaches in neuro-oncology.

References

1.
Solanki S, Singh UP, Chouhan SS, Jain S. Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using Intelligence Techniques: An Overview. IEEE Access. 2023;11:12870–86.
2.
Esposito S, Ruggiero E, Di Castelnuovo A, Costanzo S, Bonaccio M, Bracone F, et al. Identifying brain tumor patients’ subtypes based on pre-diagnostic history and clinical characteristics: a pilot hierarchical clustering and association analysis. Frontiers in Oncology. 2023;13.
3.
Park JH, de Lomana ALG, Marzese DM, Juarez T, Feroze A, Hothi P, et al. A Systems Approach to Brain Tumor Treatment. Cancers. 2021;13(13):3152.
4.
Aggarwal M, Tiwari AK, Sarathi MP, Bijalwan A. An early detection and segmentation of Brain Tumor using Deep Neural Network. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making. 2023;23(1).
5.
Shafana NJ, SenthilSelvi A. Analysis of AI based Brain Tumor Detection and Diagnosis. 2021 4th International Conference on Computing and Communications Technologies (ICCCT). IEEE; 2021. p. 627–33.
6.
Abdusalomov AB, Mukhiddinov M, Whangbo TK. Brain Tumor Detection Based on Deep Learning Approaches and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cancers. 2023;15(16):4172.
7.
Jena B, Saxena S, Nayak GK, Balestrieri A, Gupta N, Khanna NN, et al. Brain Tumor Characterization Using Radiogenomics in Artificial Intelligence Framework. Cancers. 2022;14(16):4052.
8.
Mohan P, Veerappampalayam Easwaramoorthy S, Subramani N, Subramanian M, Meckanzi S. Handcrafted Deep-Feature-Based Brain Tumor Detection and Classification Using MRI Images. Electronics. 2022;11(24):4178.
9.
Ramkissoon LA, Pegram W, Haberberger J, Danziger N, Lesser G, Strowd R, et al. Genomic Profiling of Circulating Tumor DNA From Cerebrospinal Fluid to Guide Clinical Decision Making for Patients With Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors. Frontiers in Neurology. 2020;11.
10.
Khalighi S, Reddy K, Midya A, Pandav KB, Madabhushi A, Abedalthagafi M. Artificial intelligence in neuro-oncology: advances and challenges in brain tumor diagnosis, prognosis, and precision treatment. npj Precision Oncology. 2024;8(1).
11.
Rasool M, Ismail NA, Boulila W, Ammar A, Samma H, Yafooz WMS, et al. A Hybrid Deep Learning Model for Brain Tumour Classification. Entropy. 2022;24(6):799.
12.
Raza A, Ayub H, Khan JA, Ahmad I, S. Salama A, Daradkeh YI, et al. A Hybrid Deep Learning-Based Approach for Brain Tumor Classification. Electronics. 2022;11(7):1146.
13.
Díaz-Pernas FJ, Martínez-Zarzuela M, Antón-Rodríguez M, González-Ortega D. A Deep Learning Approach for Brain Tumor Classification and Segmentation Using a Multiscale Convolutional Neural Network. Healthcare. 2021;9(2):153.
14.
Sadad T, Rehman A, Munir A, Saba T, Tariq U, Ayesha N, et al. Brain tumor detection and multi‐classification using advanced deep learning techniques. Microscopy Research and Technique. 2021;84(6):1296–308.
15.
Biswas A, Islam MdS. Brain Tumor Types Classification using K-means Clustering and ANN Approach. 2021 2nd International Conference on Robotics, Electrical and Signal Processing Techniques (ICREST). IEEE; 2021. p. 654–8.
16.
Renugadevi M, Narasimhan K, Ravikumar CV, Anbazhagan R, Pau G, Ramkumar K, et al. Machine Learning Empowered Brain Tumor Segmentation and Grading Model for Lifetime Prediction. IEEE Access. 2023;11:120868–80.
17.
Thakur T, Batra I, Malik A, Ghimire D, Kim SH, Sanwar Hosen ASM. RNN-CNN Based Cancer Prediction Model for Gene Expression. IEEE Access. 2023;11:131024–44.
18.
Dixon J, Akinniyi O, Abdelhamid A, Saleh GA, Rahman MM, Khalifa F. A Hybrid Learning-Architecture for Improved Brain Tumor Recognition. Algorithms. 2024;17(6):221.
19.
Gu C, Ren S. Enhancing brain cancer type prediction through machine learning algorithms and feature selection techniques. Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical. 2024;57(42):425601.
20.
Arora S, Lamba M. 3D brain image based tumor classification using ensemble of reinforcement transferbased belief neural networks. Multimedia Tools and Applications. 2025;(14):14001–28.
21.
Menze BH, Jakab A, Bauer S, Kalpathy-Cramer J, Farahani K, Kirby J, et al. The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS). IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2015;34(10):1993–2024.
22.
Villani F, Civico R, Pucci S, Pizzimenti L, Nappi R, De Martini PM, et al. A database of the coseismic effects following the 30 October 2016 Norcia earthquake in Central Italy. Scientific Data. 2018;5(1).
23.
Kim H, Lim S, Park M, Kim K, Kang SH, Lee Y. Optimization of Fast Non-Local Means Noise Reduction Algorithm Parameter in Computed Tomographic Phantom Images Using 3D Printing Technology. Diagnostics. 2024;14(15):1589.
24.
Bhattacharyya S, Dutta P, Samanta D, Mukherjee A, Pan I. 2021;
25.
Madugalla A, Perera M. Innovative uses of medical embedded systems in healthcare. Progress in Electronics and Communication Engineering. 2024;(1):48–59.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.