×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

EXPLORING THE ROLE OF DIGITAL TWINS IN ENHANCING OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY AND DECISION-MAKING IN INDIAN MANUFACTURING FIRMS

By
Roohee Khan Orcid logo ,
Roohee Khan

Kalinga University , Raipur , India

Ashu Nayak Orcid logo
Ashu Nayak

Kalinga University , Raipur , India

Abstract

Indian manufacturing companies are progressively implementing Industry 4.0 technologies to enhance the level of operational efficiency and the managerial decision-making process; nevertheless, there is limited empirical evidence of how the adoption of the Digital Twin (DT) affects performance, especially in the emerging economy environment. This research examines how researchers can use Digital Twin capabilities to improve the efficiency of operations and effectiveness of decisions in Indian manufacturing companies. Quantitative, cross-sectional research design was used based on the data on surveys conducted on 126 professionals working in the automotive, electronics, and process manufacturing industries. The proposed relationships and the mediation effects were tested using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). The findings suggest that the capabilities of Digital Twin positively influence the operational efficiency (β = 0.61, p < 0.001), which explains a third of its variation (R²= 0.37). Operational efficiency, on the other hand, has an overwhelming effect on decision-making effectiveness (β 0.53, p < 0.01) and the model accounts for 41 % of the variation in decision outcomes (R²= 0.41). The mediation analysis proves that the relationship between the Digital Twin capabilities and the decision-making effectiveness is partially mediated by operational efficiency. The decomposition analysis also shows that the largest marginal contribution to efficiency gains is yielded by analytics-based Digital Twin applications that are linked to a significant shortening of decision lead time. This paper concludes that the strategic value of Digital twins is that they merge real-time monitoring, simulation, and analytics to provide cumulative operational and managerial value. Such results provide practical information to manufacturing managers who want to focus on high-impact Digital Twin implementations.

References

1.
Singh G, Singh S, Daultani Y, Chouhan M. Measuring the influence of digital twins on the sustainability of manufacturing supply chain: A mediating role of supply chain resilience and performance. Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering. 2023;186:109711.
2.
Gardas BB, Gunasekaran A, Narwane VS. Unlocking factors of digital twins for smart manufacturing: a case of emerging economy. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing. 2023;37(10–11):1463–93.
3.
Mojumder MU. IMPACT OF LEAN SIX SIGMA ON MANUFACTURING EFFICIENCY USING A DIGITAL TWIN-BASED PERFORMANCE EVALUATION FRAMEWORK. ASRC Procedia: Global Perspectives in Science and Scholarship. 2025;01(01):343–75.
4.
Dutta G, Kumar R, Sindhwani R, Singh RK. Digital transformation priorities of India’s discrete manufacturing SMEs – a conceptual study in perspective of Industry 4.0. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal. 2020;30(3):289–314.
5.
Fantozzi IC, Santolamazza A, Loy G, Schiraldi MM. Digital Twins: Strategic Guide to Utilize Digital Twins to Improve Operational Efficiency in Industry 4.0. Future Internet. 2025;17(1):41.
6.
Santos R, Piqueiro H, Dias R, Rocha CD. Transitioning trends into action: A simulation-based Digital Twin architecture for enhanced strategic and operational decision-making. Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering. 2024;198:110616.
7.
Attaran S, Attaran M, Celik BG. Digital Twins and Industrial Internet of Things: Uncovering operational intelligence in industry 4.0. Decision Analytics Journal. 2024;10:100398.
8.
Damtew A. Roles of digital twins on material performances and utilization on upstream industry (The case of automotive industry). The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 2024;(7):3525–36.
9.
Anthony R, K. S. A, K P, Sawhney A. An exploratory study on the application of digital twins in the Indian construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management. 2024;25(9):996–1007.
10.
Sarkar S. AI-ENABLED DIGITAL TWIN FRAMEWORK FOR PREDICTIVE MAINTENANCE AND ENERGY OPTIMIZATION IN INDUSTRIAL SYSTEMS. ASRC Procedia: Global Perspectives in Science and Scholarship. 2025;01(01):1359–89.
11.
West S, Stoll O, Meierhofer J, Züst S. Digital Twin Providing New Opportunities for Value Co-Creation through Supporting Decision-Making. Applied Sciences. 2021;11(9):3750.
12.
Celestin M. How Digital Twins Are Enhancing Supply Chain Resilience Against Market Disruptions. Brainae Journal of Business, Sciences and Technology (BJBST). 2023;(4):989–99.
13.
G V, Gopikrishnan S, Boulila W, Koubaa A, Srivastava G. Digital Twins and Cyber-Physical Systems: A New Frontier in Computer Modeling. Computer Modeling in Engineering &amp; Sciences. 2025;143(1):51–113.
14.
Hossain M, Talapatra S, Saha P, Belal H. From theory to practice: leveraging digital twin technologies and supply chain disruption mitigation strategies for enhanced supply chain resilience with strategic fit in focus. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management. 2025;(1):87–109.
15.
Singh S, Barde A, Mahanty B, Tiwari MK. Digital Twin Driven Inclusive Manufacturing Using Emerging Technologies. IFAC-PapersOnLine. 2019;52(13):2225–30.
16.
Maheshwari P, Kamble S, Kumar S, Belhadi A, Gupta S. Digital twin-based warehouse management system: a theoretical toolbox for future research and applications. The International Journal of Logistics Management. 2023;35(4):1073–106.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.