,
Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research , Chennai , India
Meenakshi Academy of Higher Education and Research , Chennai , India
Medical disorders in women can often be the underlying cause of various symptoms and are frequently associated with anovulatory conditions, such as Endometriosis. The limitation of finding the specific diseases in image processing approach is complex structure tissue, early detection and treatment of these conditions are essential. To address these challenges, this review research with Multiple Machine Learning (ML) approaches such as Gradient Boosted Decision Tree, SE-ResNet-34 network, and CNN-based deep learning, for classification purpose for diseases identification. The datasets taken an ultrasound image related to Endometriosis, obtained from open-source platforms provided by women's healthcare facilities. Prior to analysis, these input images undergo data preprocessing techniques to enhance their quality and relevance, facilitating accurate evaluation of Endometriosis cases. The CNN network architecture is applied to extract intricate features from the input datasets. SE-ResNet-34 networks are particularly effective for image classification tasks due to their ability to address the advanced gradient problem, allowing for the construction of deeper network architectures with enhanced performance. Similarly, CNN, a powerful ensemble learning method, improves predictive accuracy by iteratively reducing classification errors. Performance metrics such as accuracy, sensitivity, and F1-score are used to evaluate the efficacy of these algorithms in the early diagnosis of Endometriosis and improving healthcare outcomes for women.
This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
0
The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.