×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

INTEGRATING LEAN THINKING AND GREEN MANUFACTURING FOR SUSTAINABLE ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IMPROVEMENT

By
Dr. Asfad Murtada Said Orcid logo ,
Dr. Asfad Murtada Said

Assistant Professor, Department of Business Administration Techniques, Technical Collage of Management, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq

Dr. Mundher Abbas Shaalan Orcid logo ,
Dr. Mundher Abbas Shaalan
Contact Dr. Mundher Abbas Shaalan

Assistant Professor, Department of Hospital Management Techniques, Technical Collage of Management, Al-Furat Al-Awsat Technical University, Kufa/Najaf, Iraq

Dr. Kabas Zuhir Alhasani Orcid logo
Dr. Kabas Zuhir Alhasani

Assistant Professor, Department of Total Quality Management Techniques, Technical Collage of Management, Middle Technical University, Baghdad, Iraq

Abstract

The issue of environmental sustainability is now a challenge for manufacturers in developing economies, in which the use of resources is high and the use of cleaner technologies is not widespread. Little evidence of how lean thinking translates into environmental outcomes in the context of green manufacturing is found, especially in the Iraqi industrial sector. This study aims to investigate the impact of Lean Thinking (LT) on Environmental Sustainability (ES) and mediate the environmental impact of Green Manufacturing (GM) in Apparel Factories in Najaf, Iraq. A quantitative cross sectional survey was conducted using a five point likert scale questionnaire with 45 items randomly sent to 250 employees of which 145 questionnaires were returned (response rate-90.6%). Higher-order constructs were employed in the analysis of data using partial least squares structural equation modelling (PLS-SEM) software program "SmartPLS 4". The range of the composite reliability was 0.801 to 0.970 while all the heterotrait–monotrait ratios were less than 0.90. LT had a significant positive effect on ES (β = 0.376, t = 5.415, p < 0.001) and on GM (β = 0.797, t = 15.331, p < 0.001), and GM significantly affected ES (β = 0.603, t = 8.624, p < 0.001). The indirect effect of LT on ES through GM was significant (β = 0.481, p<0.001) and accounted for 56.1% of the total effect, meaning that GM partially mediated LT's effect on ES. The model explained 63.5% of the variance in GM and 86.7% in ES (Q² = 0.365; SRMR = 0.077). The results indicate that the best environmental impacts of lean thinking can be achieved through green manufacturing capabilities, providing an integrated lean–green strategy for apparel manufacturers in the developing economies.

References

1.
Garza-Reyes JA. Lean and green – a systematic review of the state of the art literature. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2015;102:18–29.
2.
Caldera HTS, Desha C, Dawes L. Exploring the role of lean thinking in sustainable business practice: A systematic literature review. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2017;167:1546–65.
3.
Bilancia A, Costa F, Staudacher AP. Achieving sustainability and circular economy in the luxury fashion industry through lean practices: A systematic literature review. Computers &amp; Industrial Engineering. 2025;206:111107.
4.
Dües CM, Tan KH, Lim M. Green as the new Lean: how to use Lean practices as a catalyst to greening your supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2013;40:93–100.
5.
Belhadi A, Kamble SS, Zkik K, Cherrafi A, Touriki FE. The integrated effect of Big Data Analytics, Lean Six Sigma and Green Manufacturing on the environmental performance of manufacturing companies: The case of North Africa. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2020;252:119903.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.