×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

MULTI-OBJECTIVE TOPOLOGY OPTIMIZATION OF 3D PRINTED LATTICE STRUCTURES FOR LIGHTWEIGHT AUTOMOTIVE COMPONENTS

By
Sapna Bawankar Orcid logo ,
Sapna Bawankar

Assistant Professor, Kalinga University , Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh , India

Priya Vij Orcid logo
Priya Vij

Assistant Professor, Kalinga University , Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh , India

Abstract

The automotive industry is increasingly focused on developing lightweight, fuel-efficient, and structurally robust components to meet stringent performance and sustainability requirements. Additively manufactured lattice structures have emerged as a promising solution due to their high strength-to-weight ratio, energy absorption capability, and geometric flexibility; however, achieving an optimal balance among competing objectives such as mass reduction, mechanical stiffness, strength, and manufacturability remains a significant challenge. This study proposes a multi-objective topology optimization framework for the design of 3D-printed lattice-based automotive components. The framework integrates density-based topology optimization with lattice parameterization and a multi-objective evolutionary optimization algorithm to simultaneously minimize structural mass and maximize mechanical performance under realistic automotive loading conditions. Finite element analysis is employed to evaluate stress distribution, displacement, and compliance, while additive manufacturing constraints—including minimum feature size and printability—are explicitly embedded within the optimization process to ensure fabrication feasibility. The resulting lattice-optimized configurations are assessed through extensive numerical simulations and comparative performance analysis. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves an average weight reduction of approximately 35% while maintaining or improving structural stiffness and strength compared to conventional solid and uniform lattice designs. The generated Pareto-optimal solutions provide designers with flexibility to select optimal trade-offs tailored to specific automotive applications. Overall, the proposed framework significantly outperforms traditional single-objective optimization approaches in terms of material efficiency and mechanical performance. This research presents a scalable and manufacturable design methodology that bridges the gap between theoretical topology optimization and industrially viable lightweight automotive components, supporting the broader adoption of additive manufacturing in sustainable vehicle design.

References

1.
Reginald PJ. Topology Optimization of 3D-Printed Lattice Structures for Lightweight Mechanical Components. 2024 Dec 14:1-7.
2.
Zhang Y, Shan Y, Liu X, He T. An integrated multi-objective topology optimization method for automobile wheels made of lightweight materials. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization. 2021 Sep;64(3):1585-605.
3.
Huang Y, He S, Tian X, Li W, Mei Z, Liu P, Kong W, Lei L, Wang P, Li J, Li D. Multiscale topology optimization and 3D printing of continuous carbon fiber reinforced composites lattice structure. Composites Part B: Engineering. 2025 Jun 4:112691.
4.
Hou W, He P, Yang Y, Sang L. Crashworthiness optimization of crash box with 3D-printed lattice structures. International Journal of Mechanical Sciences. 2023 Jun 1;247:108198.
5.
Deshmukh S. Topology Optimization in Additive Manufacturing for Lightweight Structures: AI-Driven Design and Structural Performance in Aerospace and Automotive Applications. South Asian Res J Eng Tech. 2024;6(6):205-12.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.