×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

METARFM: A META-LEARNING FRAMEWORK FOR THE ADAPTIVE SELECTION OF RFM MODEL ARIANTS IN CUSTOMER SEGMENTATION

By
F. Mary Magdalene Jane Orcid logo ,
F. Mary Magdalene Jane

Professor, Department of Computer Science with Data Analytics, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College, India

V. Pream Sudha Orcid logo ,
V. Pream Sudha

Professor, Department of Computer Science with Data Analytics, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College India

S. Saranya Orcid logo ,
S. Saranya

Associate Professor, Department of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College , Coimbatore , India

P. Usha Orcid logo ,
P. Usha

Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College , Coimbatore , India

V. Santhana Lakshmi Orcid logo ,
V. Santhana Lakshmi

Associate Professor, Department of Computer Science with Data Analytics, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College , Coimbatore , India

S.R. Kalaiselvi Orcid logo
S.R. Kalaiselvi

Assistant Professor, Department of Computer Science, Dr. N.G.P. Arts and Science College , Coimbatore , India

Abstract

The Recency-Frequency-Monetary (RFM) model is a widely used method for customer segmentation, but its effectiveness depends on selecting the appropriate variant (e.g., weighted or entropy-based) for a given dataset. This selection process is typically manual and task-specific, leading to inconsistent results and limited generalizability. To address this issue, we present MetaRFM, a novel automated framework for selecting optimal RFM variants. MetaRFM mines a set of meta-features—such as sparsity, diversity, and skewness—extracted from customer transaction datasets, including both personal transaction data and product purchase information. These meta-features characterize the dataset at a high level, enabling the framework to predict which RFM variant would perform best. A meta-learner is trained to map these meta-features to the performance of different RFM variants, which are evaluated using both cluster quality metrics (Silhouette Score, Davies-Bouldin Index) and business-relevant metrics (predictive lift, churn prediction accuracy). Extensive experiments conducted on real-world datasets from retail, e-commerce, and subscription services show that MetaRFM consistently outperforms static and single-variant models. On average, MetaRFM improves cluster separation by 15.7% and campaign lift by 22.3%. This framework provides a systematic, scalable solution for selecting the most appropriate RFM model, improving segmentation robustness and business relevance. The results highlight the substantial potential of meta-learning for adaptive, context-aware analytics in marketing, offering a more effective approach to customer segmentation and optimizing marketing strategies.

References

1.
Rungruang C, Riyapan P, Intarasit A, Chuarkham K, Muangprathub J. RFM model customer segmentation  based on hierarchical approach using FCA. Expert Systems with Applications. 2024 Mar 1; 237:121449.
2.
Cooke S. Database Marketing: strategy or tactical tool?. Marketing Intelligence & Planning. 1994 Jul 1;12(6):4-7.
3.
Khajvand M, Zolfaghar K, Ashoori S, Alizadeh S. Estimating customer lifetime value based on RFM  analysis of customer purchase behavior: Case study. Procedia computer science. 2011 Jan 1;3:57-63.
4.
McCarty JA, Hastak M. Segmentation approaches in data-mining: A comparison of RFM, CHAID, and logistic Journal of business research.  2007 Jun 1;60(6):656-62.
5.
Ernawati E, Baharin SS, Kasmin F. A review of data mining methods in RFM-based customer segmentation. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2021 Apr 1;1869(1):012085.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.