×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
News Contact
Original scientific article

LOCAL PEOPLE'S ATTITUDES TOWARDS QUALITY OF ENVIRONMENT IN SERBIA – B&H CROSS-BORDER REGION

By
Mirjana Bartula ,
Mirjana Bartula
Contact Mirjana Bartula

Faculty of Applied Ecology Futura, University Singidunum, Belgrade, Serbia

Uroš Radojević ,
Uroš Radojević

Faculty of Applied Ecology Futura, University Singidunum, Belgrade, Serbia

Dragana Selmanagić ,
Dragana Selmanagić

Hydro-Engineering Institute, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Erna Zildović ,
Erna Zildović

Hydro-Engineering Institute, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Miloš Nikolić
Miloš Nikolić

Hydro-Engineering Institute, Sarajevo, Bosnia and Herzegovina

Abstract

Public participation in environmental decision-making is nowadays accepted as an integral part of the sustainable development process and an important mean for improving quality, legitimacy and capacity of environmental assessment and decisions. When communities participate in the management of their resources in form of consultation or active involvement, there is a greater likelihood of success as people are more willing to obey their own regulations than those imposed upon them from outside. This paper presents results of a survey in Serbia-BiH cross border region that explored the attitudes of local people towards natural resources and environment quality, environmental priorities and efficiency of local government in solving environmental problems. Results were used as inputs for drafting “Action plan for sustainable use of cross border natural resource” contributing in this way to better acceptance and easier implementation of the plan at the community level.

References

1.
Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T. Social learning and water resources management. Ecology and Society. 2007;12(2):5.
2.
Reed M. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: A literature review. Biological conservation. 2008;141:2417–31.
3.
Dearden PC. ICITRAP - an experimental training exercise for examining participatory approaches to project management. Public Administration and Development. 1999;19:93–104.
4.
Hoogstra-Klein MD. The value of cultural theory for participatory processes in natural resource management. Forest Policy and Economics. 2012;20:99–106.
5.
Wilshusen PR, Brechin SR, Fortwangler CL, West PC. Conservation and development at the turn of the twenty-first century. In: Contested Nature Promoting International Biodiversity with Social Justice in the Twenty-first Century. 2003. p. 1–22.
6.
Chess C, Purcell K. Public participation and the environment – do we know what works. Environmental Science and Technology. 1999;33:2685–92.
7.
Reed MS, Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ. An adaptive learning process for developing and applying sustainability indicators with local communities. Ecological Economics. 2006;59:406–18.
8.
Bartula M. Studija o održivom korišćenju i zaštiti prirodnih resursa u prekograničnom području Srbija – Bosna i Hercegovina. In: Opština Bogatić Unija ekologa. 2014.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.