×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

NEURO EMOTIONAL INTELLIGENCE AS A FRAMEWORK FOR UNDERSTANDING LEADERSHIP PERFORMANCE IN STRESSFUL WORKPLACES

By
Dr. Majo George Orcid logo ,
Dr. Majo George

Dean, Faculty of Economics, University of Economics and Finance (UEF), Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam

Dr.R.S. Lekshmi Orcid logo ,
Dr.R.S. Lekshmi

Professor, Department of Management Studies, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Dr.V. Sheela Mary Orcid logo ,
Dr.V. Sheela Mary

Professor, Department of Management, Aarupadai Veedu Institute of Technology, Vinayaka Mission's Research Foundation (DU), Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Dr.G. Nirmala Orcid logo ,
Dr.G. Nirmala

Associate Professor, Department of Management Studies, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

M. Amaravathi Orcid logo
M. Amaravathi

Research Scholar, Department of Management Studies, St. Joseph’s College of Engineering, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India

Abstract

Organizational leaders increasingly need to be able to remain effective at making decisions, controlling their emotions, and being productive with other people, even in times of increased scrutiny. While emotional intelligence has been studied extensively, there has been very little empirical research on how the integration of neuro-emotional capabilities impacts executive performance in stress-prone work environments. This study develops and empirically evaluates a Neuro Emotional Intelligence framework as an explanation of leadership effectiveness for employees in organisations characterised by high pressure to perform. Survey data from 428 manager/supervisor level employees for the technology, healthcare, manufacturing, and service industries were used in a quantitative research design that employed reliability testing, descriptive statistics, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression analyses. The proposed framework examined the effects of emotional self-regulation, social awareness, cognitive empathy, and stress adaptability on leadership effectiveness. The regression model explained 71.8% of the variability in leadership effectiveness (R2 = 0.718, F = 213.46, p < .001), with emotional self-regulation (β = 0.281, p < .001), stress adaptability (β = 0.307, p < .001), being the three strongest predictors of leadership effectiveness. The effects of social awareness and cognitive empathy on leadership effectiveness were also significantly positively related. Cronbach's alpha values produced by the reliability analysis ranged from 0.831 to 0.893, indicating satisfactory internal consistency of the measures utilized in the study. The research extends the use of neuro-emotional intelligence as a statistically significant, measurable framework to explain leadership effectiveness for people working in stressful organizations and provides practitioners with a framework for developing unique leadership  development initiatives that create resilient leaders and managers who positively impact organizations through increased executive effectiveness.

References

1.
Romão S, Ribeiro N, Gomes DR, Singh S. The Impact of Leaders’ Coaching Skills on Employees’ Happiness and Turnover Intention. Administrative Sciences. 2022;12(3):84.
2.
Li Z, Yang C, Yang Z, Zhao Y. The impact of middle managers’ digital leadership on employee work engagement. Frontiers in Psychology. 2024;15.
3.
Adu IN, Darko NY, Kyei-Frimpong M, Yeboah-Kordee NS. Leader–member exchange and work–family conflict; the moderating role of emotional intelligence and supervisory support. Asia-Pacific Journal of Business Administration. 2025;17(5):1275–93.
4.
Chigeda F, Ndofirepi TM, Steyn R. Continuance in organizational commitment: The role of emotional intelligence, work‐life balance support, and work‐related stress. Global Business and Organizational Excellence. 2022;42(1):22–38.
5.
Öztürk Çelik D. Emotional Intelligence and Psychological Well-Being of Turkish Physical Education and Sports Athlete–Students: The Mediating Roles of Self-Efficacy and Burnout. Behavioral Sciences. 2025;15(3):314.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.