×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

ASSESSING THE ROLE OF ETHNOPSYCHOLOGICAL DIMENSIONS IN WORK–FAMILY BALANCE AMONG TECHNICAL ORGANIZATION

By
Olmosbek Eshmuradov Orcid logo ,
Olmosbek Eshmuradov
Contact Olmosbek Eshmuradov

Associate Professor, Head of the Department, Department of Applied Psychology, Termez State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Surkhandarya Region, Uzbekistan

Salim Doniyorov Orcid logo ,
Salim Doniyorov

Associate Professor, University of Journalism and Mass Communications of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan

Shohida Jumayeva Orcid logo ,
Shohida Jumayeva

Associate Professor, Department of Social Sciences, Termez University of Economics and Service Termez, Uzbekistan

Nigora Turaeva Orcid logo ,
Nigora Turaeva

Department of Psychology, Termez State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Surkhandarya Region, Uzbekistan

Muxayyo Karimova Orcid logo ,
Muxayyo Karimova

Department of Applied Psychology, Termez State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Surkhandarya Region, Uzbekistan

Kamola Sadirova Orcid logo ,
Kamola Sadirova

Associate Professor, Nizami National Pedagogical University of Uzbekistan, Tashkent, Uzbekistan.

Gavhar Mengliyeva Orcid logo
Gavhar Mengliyeva

Department of Applied Psychology, Termez State Pedagogical Institute, Termez, Surkhandarya Region, Uzbekistan

Abstract

The balance between occupational pressures and family obligations continues to be a consistent issue in technical organizations because of their highly scheduled structure, shifts in production systems, and command organization culture combined with deep-rooted cultural traditions. This research focuses on the effect of ethnopsychological characteristics including family collectivism, ethnic and clan identity, power distance, gender roles traditionality, filial responsibility, and uncertainty avoidance on the work-family balance of employees working in technical organizations in engineering, production, and technical support positions. The study is based on the field of cross-cultural organizational psychology and provides the analysis of the topic under consideration in the context of the post-Soviet Central Asia that features extended families, collectivism, and gradual evolution of the corporate culture. The methodology utilized for this research includes a quantitative cross-sectional design with a stratified sample of employees employed in the mechanical, electrical, production, quality control, and technical support departments of technical organizations. Further departmental variations also show that floor workers score lower on work-family balance as compared to technical support workers, which is due to greater rigidity in their schedules. These findings will be discussed in light of current cross-cultural work-family literature and their relevance to human resource management, supervision, and organizational culture in a technical organization in a collectivist society will be highlighted.

References

1.
Díaz-Loving R. Ethnopsychology: Inserting Socio-cultural Components into a Bio-psychological Discipline. Latin American Voices. Springer International Publishing; 2019. p. 13–55.
2.
Amstad FT, Meier LL, Fasel U, Elfering A, Semmer NK. A meta-analysis of work–family conflict and various outcomes with a special emphasis on cross-domain versus matching-domain relations. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology. 2011;16(2):151–69.
3.
Mayer CH, Louw L. Managing cross-cultural conflict in organizations. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management. 2012;12(1):3–8.
4.
Annink A, den Dulk L. Autonomy: the panacea for self-employed women’s work-life balance? Community, Work & Family. 2012;15(4):383–402.
5.
Koul R. Work and Family Identities and Engineering Identity. Journal of Engineering Education. 2018;107(2):219–37.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.