×
Home Current Archive Editorial board
Instructions for papers
For Authors Aim & Scope Contact
Original scientific article

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE IN AUDITING: EVALUATING THE IMPACT OF GENERATIVE AND PREDICTIVE MODELS ON AUDIT QUALITY AND EFFICIENCY

By
Dr.S. Edmund Christopher Orcid logo ,
Dr.S. Edmund Christopher
Contact Dr.S. Edmund Christopher

Assistant Professor, Department of Finance & Accounting, City University Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Dr. Jaishu Antony Orcid logo ,
Dr. Jaishu Antony

Associate Professor, Department of Finance & Accounting, City University Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Dr. Zaheda Daruwala Orcid logo ,
Dr. Zaheda Daruwala

Associate Professor, College of Business, City University Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Mahmoud Abouagwa Orcid logo
Mahmoud Abouagwa

Department of Mathematical Statistics, Faculty of Graduate Studies for Statistical Research, Cairo University, Giza, Egypt, College of Business, City University Ajman, Ajman, United Arab Emirates

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) is significantly contributing to beneficial transformations in auditing by enhancing analytical capabilities, automating monotonous tasks, and refining decision-making processes. This piece of research looks into the effects of predictive and generative AI on the quality of auditing as well as its efficiency. Moreover, the research examines how professional skepticism can influence the auditing process in environments where AI is actively used. The research was conducted on the basis of an applied explanatory design with the use of a quantitative cross-sectional method. Data for the study were gathered from a sample of 214 general auditors who work for either the Big Four or other leading international firms, together with information regarding the performance of 38 audit engagements. The application of hierarchical regression and Structural Equation Modeling (SEM) allowed researchers to prove their hypotheses. The current research indicates that predictive AI is able to positively influence the quality of auditing (fraud detection, anomaly detection, risk assessment, and so on) (β=0.53, p<0.001). Generative AI could improve the efficiency of auditing due to its key functions that include automation of documents, reports, and financial data (β=0.47, p<0.001). Additionally, professional skepticism could improve the quality of auditing as well (β=0.29, p<0.01). The results of the multiple regression model accounted for 52% of the overall audit performance, while the results of SEM (χ²/df=2.11, CFI=0.94, RMSEA=0.061, SRMR=0.054) showed satisfactory goodness of fit of the model. The findings of the study make a significant contribution to academia, providing the empirical basis for highlighting the critical roles of predictive and generative AI technologies. Moreover, the research findings are of great practical value for audit companies that are planning to implement AI into auditing processes. Finally, the results show that there is a necessity to create frameworks for AI-led auditing processes that should strike a balance between technical advancement and human skills.

References

1.
Huang L, Liu D. Towards Intelligent Auditing: Exploring the Future of Artificial Intelligence in Auditing. Procedia Computer Science. 2024;247:654–63.
2.
Alles MG. Drivers of the Use and Facilitators and Obstacles of the Evolution of Big Data by the Audit Profession. Accounting Horizons. 2015;29(2):439–49.
3.
Zhang D, Zhou J. Implications of generative AI technology on auditing practice and research – a commentary. Managerial Auditing Journal. 2025;41(1):153–62.
4.
Anwar A, Akeel MO. Integrating Artificial Intelligence in Audit Workflow: Opportunities, Architecture, and Challenges: A Systematic Review. Accounting and Auditing. 2026;2(1):4.
5.
De Jesus Silva Dos Santos DL, Dos Santos GC. Technological convergence in financial auditing: A systematic literature review. Data Science in Finance and Economics. 2025;5(4):440–65.

Citation

This is an open access article distributed under the  Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC) License which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. 

Article metrics

Google scholar: See link

Issue image
Issue 36, 2026
See full issue

Citations

Crossref Logo

0

The statements, opinions and data contained in the journal are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publisher and the editor(s). We stay neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.